Skip to main content
英語練習試験englishpracticeexam.com
練習テスト試験ガイド料金
ログイン新規登録
英語練習試験

English Practice Exam · englishpracticeexam.com

英語能力試験の成功をサポートする無料練習テスト。

クイックリンク

  • ホーム
  • 練習テスト
  • 料金

法的情報

  • プライバシーポリシー
  • 利用規約
  • お問い合わせ

他の言語

日本語العربيةবাংলাEnglishFrançaisગુજરાતીहिन्दीBahasa Indonesia한국어Bahasa Melayu普通话नेपालीPortuguês (Brasil)ਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolภาษาไทยTiếng Việt

© 2025 英語練習試験. All rights reserved.

ウェブサイト制作:S-Block TechnologiesS-Block Technologies
  1. ホーム
  2. /
  3. Cambridge
  4. /
  5. C1 Advanced
  6. /
  7. パート 8
  8. /
  9. 練習テスト
C1Reading and Use of Englishパート 8

Multiple matching

You are going to read an extract. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-E). The sections may be chosen more than once.

Beyond the Steering Wheel: Rethinking Urban Travel

How cities can reduce car use without harming daily life

The Promise (and the Panic) of Car-Light Streets

When our city announced a ‘car-light’ plan, the reaction was immediate: cyclists celebrated, shop owners predicted ruin, and drivers asked—fairly—how they were meant to get their children to school in the rain. What surprised me wasn’t the disagreement but the certainty on both sides. Supporters talked as if removing cars automatically creates community; critics insisted it automatically destroys convenience. Neither is guaranteed. A street with fewer cars can be quieter, safer and more pleasant, yet it can also become a corridor of delivery vans if planners forget that goods still need to move. And while a ten-minute walk sounds charming on a sunny Saturday, it feels like a punishment when you’re carrying groceries after a late shift. Still, the enthusiasm isn’t baseless: cities that have reduced traffic often report better air quality and fewer accidents. The question is whether the benefits arrive for everyone or only for those who can afford to live near the centre.

Questions
Select section:
ABCDE
1.

Which section/person suggests that both supporters and opponents of reducing car use are overconfident about what will happen?

2.

Which section/person points out that limiting private cars can still leave a street dominated by other vehicles if logistics aren’t planned properly?

3.

In which section does the writer imply that the advantages of traffic reduction may mainly help people in central, wealthier areas?

4.

Which section/person criticises the way people judge public transport more harshly than driving by using different standards?

5.

Which section/person argues that dependable, frequent services and good disruption information matter more than high-tech innovations in getting people to change their habits?

6.

Which section/person mentions that without late-night public transport, some workers will still see a car as the only realistic choice?

7.

Which section/person describes changing their mind after personal experience and realising that minimal cycle provision doesn’t count as genuine infrastructure?

8.

Which section/person expresses discomfort with portraying one group of road users as morally superior to another?

9.

Which section/person argues that charging for parking can rapidly influence behaviour, but warns that poorly designed charges may be seen as unfair to those with fewer housing choices?

10.

Which section/person highlights that working from home reduced some journeys but also created new patterns of travel, and implies the benefits were distributed unevenly across job types?

0 of 10 answered

← Multiple matchingの全テストに戻るC1 Advancedの全セクションを見る

ここで止まらないで

継続的に練習する受験者は、本番で大幅にスコアが向上します。この勢いを維持しましょう。

数千人の受験者に信頼されています

$8/month

1日あたり$0.27未満

  • すべての練習テストが無制限
  • ライティング課題のAIフィードバック
  • いつでもキャンセル可能 — 縛りなし
無制限の練習を始める

すでにアカウントをお持ちですか? Log in

無料登録して練習を始めましょう。 Sign up

Also practice for:

IELTSTOEFLTOEICPTE Academic