Skip to main content
英語練習試験englishpracticeexam.com
練習テスト試験ガイド料金
ログイン新規登録
英語練習試験

English Practice Exam · englishpracticeexam.com

英語能力試験の成功をサポートする無料練習テスト。

クイックリンク

  • ホーム
  • 練習テスト
  • 料金

法的情報

  • プライバシーポリシー
  • 利用規約
  • お問い合わせ

他の言語

日本語العربيةবাংলাEnglishFrançaisગુજરાતીहिन्दीBahasa Indonesia한국어Bahasa Melayu普通话नेपालीPortuguês (Brasil)ਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolภาษาไทยTiếng Việt

© 2025 英語練習試験. All rights reserved.

ウェブサイト制作:S-Block TechnologiesS-Block Technologies
  1. ホーム
  2. /
  3. Cambridge
  4. /
  5. C1 Advanced
  6. /
  7. パート 8
  8. /
  9. 練習テスト
C1Reading and Use of Englishパート 8

Multiple matching

You are going to read an extract. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-E). The sections may be chosen more than once.

The Four-Day Week: Progress, Privilege, or Problem?

The impact of the four-day work week on productivity, wellbeing, and society

A tempting promise: more life, same output

When companies announce a four-day week, the headlines make it sound like a minor miracle: fewer hours, identical productivity, and employees who suddenly have time to cook, exercise and phone their grandparents. I understand the excitement. The most convincing pilots I’ve seen didn’t simply “cut Friday”; they redesigned how work happens—shorter meetings, clearer priorities, fewer layers of approval. In those cases, output didn’t fall because a lot of the old schedule was never truly productive in the first place. Still, I’m wary of the triumphal tone. Some roles depend on being available rather than producing a neat deliverable, and not every team has the power to refuse last-minute requests. The four-day week can be a genuine improvement, but only if it’s treated as an organisational change, not a motivational poster. Otherwise, the same workload is squeezed into fewer days and everyone just looks busier while feeling more exhausted.

Questions
Select section:
ABCDE
1.

Which section/person suggests that a four-day week only works when organisations rethink how work is organised, rather than simply removing a day?

2.

Which section/person warns that some jobs are defined by being on hand for others, making a shorter week harder to implement fairly?

3.

In which section does the writer argue that ‘productivity’ is not a single straightforward measure and can look different depending on what you value?

4.

Which section/person implies that some reported ‘successes’ may be misleading because employees keep targets up by working outside official hours?

5.

Which section/person highlights that the policy could deepen divisions inside the same organisation, with some teams enjoying long weekends while others must remain accessible?

6.

Which section/person questions the claim that a four-day week automatically improves equality for parents, pointing out practical obstacles outside the workplace?

7.

Which section/person suggests that the biggest barrier to making the change succeed is not timetabling, but workplace attitudes that reward long hours and constant visibility?

8.

In which section does the writer express both optimism about the benefits and criticism of how casually organisations claim the transition will be easy?

9.

Which section/person contrasts possible environmental gains with ways the extra day off could cancel them out through different leisure or consumption choices?

10.

Which section/person argues that the public often frames the four-day week too narrowly as an internal workplace benefit, ignoring broader effects on society and infrastructure?

0 of 10 answered

← Multiple matchingの全テストに戻るC1 Advancedの全セクションを見る

ここで止まらないで

継続的に練習する受験者は、本番で大幅にスコアが向上します。この勢いを維持しましょう。

数千人の受験者に信頼されています

$8/month

1日あたり$0.27未満

  • すべての練習テストが無制限
  • ライティング課題のAIフィードバック
  • いつでもキャンセル可能 — 縛りなし
無制限の練習を始める

すでにアカウントをお持ちですか? Log in

無料登録して練習を始めましょう。 Sign up

Also practice for:

IELTSTOEFLTOEICPTE Academic